Monday, January 29, 2007

Another Interesting Article

Thanks to my Dad for showing my this one.

Friday, January 26, 2007

Environmentalism


As I was driving around this morning I was listening to CJOB and they were talking about environmentalism. The host of the show was asking people if environmentalism is really the number one election issue in Canada today. Recently environmentalism in the polls was placed as the number one election issue in Canada putting health care in the number two spot. The host of the show raised an interesting point, that if the economy wasn't doing so well no one would be talking about the environment. I think he was right, and in that regard the environment probably isn't that number one election issue. But what I didn't like was that it seemed that he was saying that we shouldn't put as much emphasis on the environment because if things were different it wouldn't be the number one election issue. I think that at a time like this when the economy is doing well and people are generally happy, we need to take advantage and make progress on issues like the environment. There is no denying that it is an important issue and will only get more important in the future. The environment is also a big issue right now because the Liberals have made it an issue. A warm winter coupled with Stephane Dion's policies have made this a huge issue and if the winter was cold and Michael Ignatieff had won the Liberal leadership no one would be talking environment and I wouldn't have written this post.

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Blogging is Harder Than it Looks

So I have found it quite hard lately to find something good to write about. There has been lots going on in the past week but none are really that interesting. Bush made a big speech, I watched the NHL skills competition instead. Moshe Katsav is going to be indicted for rape, who really wants to read about that? So I guess this is just a heads up to the 3 people that read this blog, that I'm always reading and looking for new things to write and I'll be back with something interesting as soon as something interesting happens. In the meantime here is an interesting article about a grave injustice being done on a young guy in Georgia.

Friday, January 19, 2007

Interesting Article

Thanks to Ingo for pointing out this interesting article from Ha'aretz

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Jews and Stephen Harper

It really bothers me when Jews tell me they are going to vote for Stephen Harper in the next election because he supported Israel in Lebanon. I understand that not many Canadian Prime Ministers have supported Israel outright like Harper did but that doesn't give a good reason to vote for him. What I mean by this is although Harper supported Israel his support means nothing. Canada does not have a role in the Middle East and especially not in Israel. People want to vote for leaders that support their causes, and Jews support Israel, but the fact the Harper supported Israel doesn't mean that the other leaders are anti-Semitic or that they hate Israel. People put way too much emphasis on the fact that Harper supported Israel one time. We should elect our leaders based on a number of issues and especially ones that actually matter to Canada. What happens in the Middle East has absolutely no baring on domestic Canadian politics and Canada's involvement in the region is non-existent and inconsequential. I think that Harper only supported Israel because the Americans did. He wants to show Bush Jr. that he will support its endeavors in the region. Harper can and will support the US on a number of issues and if one wants this to continue then they should vote for Harper, but his support for Israel should be seen as some great turn of events for the Jews of Canada. If you want to vote for Harper go ahead, but vote for him because you think he's good for Canada and will be beneficial to you in your life in Canada, not because he supported Israel. Canada doesn't have a roll in the Middle East!

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

IDF Chief Resigns

Today the Israel Defence Forces Chief of Staff Dan Halutz resigned. His resignation comes after the loss in the Second Lebanon War in the summer of 2006. Halutz is the first official to resign over the debacle that was the war, and certainly not the last. The war in Lebanon was originally started as a response to the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers and this was the main reason for waging the war. the Israeli objectives of the war were 1) to get the kidnapped soldiers back, and 2) to destabilize Hezbollah and rid Lebanon of their influence. Neither of these objectives were met and if anything the war raised the awareness and the popularity of Hezbollah. On the Israeli side, the war proved to everyone that Ehud Olmert is not Ariel Sharon, and has no real idea on how to wage a war. The question now is, who was responsible for this embarrassing defeat? Halutz was the first Chief of Staff to have an air force background and this could be one of the reasons why the war was mostly fought unsuccessfully from the air. Other contributing factors to the defeat were the appointment of Amir Peretz to the post of Defence Minister by Ehud Olmert. This was such an odd move by the PM. The nature of Israeli politics are such that leaders from parties are given high profile cabinet positions in order to support the ruling party's coalition government. So in this context it does make sense that Paretz would get a high profile position, but the Defense portfolio is one that doesn't fit him. He doesn't have a military background and has proven that he doesn't know much about war and how to fight it. Ehud Olmert is the other major contributor to the lose of the war. Olmert also doesn't have much military background and although he has been in the government for a few years he really was just Ariel Sharon's sidekick that had to take over once Sharon got sick. The outcome of the war will be a shift back to the right in Israel and possibly the return of Bibi Netanyahu to the PMO. There is no way that Olmert can win another election. his ratings are extremely low and 85% of Israelis think that his government is corrupt (the pending corruption charges don't help this). shift to the right in Israel could see the reoccupation of the Gaza Strip (I think this is on the extreme side) there would be almost no progress on the peace process and the possibility of Israel intervening in Iran will definitely increase. Needless to say a shift to the right would be detrimental to the Palestinians (as was Netanyahu's term as PM in the 90s), and to Israelis who are sick of losing wars and seeing their civilians dying.

Currently listening to "We Shall Overcome: The Seeger Sessions" by Bruce Springsteen

Monday, January 15, 2007


Here is a cool image of Saddam that I had to share